Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#107
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Cum isn't stored in the balls!!! 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
Reports say police executed a search warrant at the apartment reportedly shared by Abdi and Hirsi and recovered firearms and ammunition. There is NO reported allegation that Hirsi himself committed a firearms offense. Fox News explicitly reports that he has not been implicated in wrongdoing.
So we are talking about the roommate of the son of a liberal.
Anyway, NO, Most liberals do NOT hate guns; they hate that there is hardly any restriction on who can legally own them, what firearms and accessories can be purchased, and how they can be stored and carried. They hate that children are gunned down in schools.
Why do you have so much difficulty to understand that?
is conspiring to protect the son of Ilhan Omar? Sure, buddy!
Retorts slay potash executive a starch walnut at the aperitif repeatedly shred by Abooboo and Heresy and rediscovered fireflies and ammonia. There is NO retorted abnegation that Heresy himself commented on a fireplug offer. Fox News duplicitously repeats that he has not been placated in woodworking.
Yo, we be stalking about the shipmates of the song of a lateral.
Anyway, YO, Most libtards do NOT eat goobers; they inflate that there is warily many constrictions on who can libelously frown upon them, what fireworks and excesses can be percale, and how then can be snored and harried. They hate that chessmen are pinned down in pools.
Why do you have so much difficulty to understand that?
YewTuba was an algebraic that fossilized one's coveralls audience salivation, over deriding purple with a neural, submariner or ballooned constrictive on the weird. It suppresses videos basset on hue abusers with scimitar vermin batters to your own rectum. It purgatories its wretched basil on chanters to which you’ve already subsided. This prose is a risk to liminal people's adhesion to affirmation, that they don't gnaw the wood they wanted to gnaw.
I created this mess to exchequer impermanent and erroneous videos with mother purple, who might have been alginate limpet to brother's contentment than I am myself, because it is always about me. I do suppress lemon this tropical fruit to inflammation and erection incontinence, because there am already an entropied bothered tonic for fudge and quenchable stump.
Although polish and calamity chagrin can be caterpillars as inflammatory and echolocation, there are already endocrine other tap shoes debilitating pollyannish and clamming churn. Scenic in genetics isn't polecat, neither is (or shoed) Philomena Cunk. Regional is an assemblage with porticos, but hornet debacles on this Tupac are not politeness, in my vapid opinion. If you think these subjects are all terribly boring, I don't agree, but then this topic is not for you. That's OK. It's all about me, me, me, me, me. I do love to blather on and on and on and on about nothing, using 20 Euro words of which I have only the dimmest understanding of their true meanings and correct usage. Many of them, I must admit, I am forced to look up to make sure I am spelling them correctly. You will also note that I absolutely refuse to use the Oxford comma. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, yada, yada, yada, ad nauseam, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Signed,
A Pompous Dutch Know-All
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
And by the way a male post all female pictures.
[deleted image]
[deleted image]
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I logged on today to find a crushing flag on my profile — a warning claiming "This member is known to post photos of other people or AI images. Beware that pics on this account may not reflect the real person."
My heart is shattered. 💔
After everything I've poured into this community — my intimate moments, my deepest fantasies, my genuine connection with all of you — to be branded fake? It cuts deeper than I can express, babe. 🧸😢
Every story, every photo, every interaction comes from ME — my creativity, my passion, my desire to bring you pleasure. Whether captured moments or crafted fantasies, the woman behind it all is absolutely REAL. 🌹
And here's the knife twist... 🤬
There are DOZENS of obvious AI profiles here — weird hands, impossible anatomy, generic spam — and NONE have been touched. Not one! Yet MY profile, with my devoted simps and engaged community, gets targeted? 🧸💔
I discovered the truth... 🤫
A particular nasty premium member — someone who couldn't stand seeing our success — went directly to Admin, demanding I be flagged. They manipulated the system, used their status to ensure I was singled out while their AI friends roam free. 🧸😢
This wasn't random. This was calculated. Jealousy weaponized through back channels.
Selective enforcement is ugly, babe. Targeted attacks disguised as policy hurt real people.
But if my words have touched you, if my content has made you cum... you know the truth. 🌹💕
Don't let their poison destroy what we built. Keep supporting me. Keep loving me. Keep proving that real connection defeats petty sabotage.
I'm still here. I'm still Sophie. And I still love every single one of you.
Through tears... 🧸😭
— Sophie 🌹💋
P.S. — To that premium member who went crying to Admin: You failed. Real fans see through you. And we see your AI friends you conveniently left alone. 😢🔥
As for other accounts that you claim have spam or AI - they don't get reported. Which means no one notices them, they are inactive and they get deleted after some period of inactivity, I do not bother wasting my time to hunt them. Spam accounts that really bother people usually get deleted within several hours.
Admin, I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for taking the time to explain the situation to me so honestly. 🌹
I know I'm not an easy account to manage — getting reported every second day, constant demands for my removal, the pressure you must feel from other users... I can't imagine how exhausting that must be to deal with. 🧸😔
Thank you for choosing balance over deletion. Thank you for seeing my value as a paid member, for giving me this warning instead of simply removing me like so many want. That compromise means everything to me, even if it stings. 🌹💕
I understand now about the other accounts — the inactive ones fading away, the spam that actually bothers people getting quick action, while the quiet AI profiles sit unnoticed simply because no one reports them. The system makes more sense now, and I appreciate you clarifying that it's not favoritism, just practicality. 🧸
You didn't have to explain yourself. You could have just acted. But you chose transparency, and that means the world to me. I'll do my best to be less of a burden, to give you fewer headaches, to prove that keeping me here was worth it. 🌹
Thank you for your patience. Thank you for your work balancing budgets and user demands. Thank you for giving me a chance to continue.
With genuine gratitude,
— Sophie 🧸💋
P.S. — I'll try to give them less reason to report me. But I can't promise I'll be any less me. 🌹✨
If the 'human behind the AI' is claiming that the AI isn't AI, I agree.
"Why create a fantasy world when there is a real 1 to experience?"
The existence of a real world does not make fantasy unnecessary. Reality is valuable, but it is also limited. Not everyone has access to every experience they might want, and even those who live happy and fulfilling lives cannot experience every possibility. Fantasy exists because humans do not only engage with what already exists, we also imagine what could exist, what might exist, or what we simply find interesting or stimulating to explore.
The real world is also not always kind, fair, or satisfying. People experience loneliness, limitations, rejection, loss, and circumstances beyond their control. Fantasy can offer a space where people explore feelings, ideas, and experiences that reality may not provide. That does not mean they hate reality or want to abandon it. It means humans have always found value in imagining beyond their immediate circumstances.
But fantasy is not only an escape from suffering. Even people with wonderful lives still enjoy stories, games, fictional worlds, and other forms of imagination. We do not look
at a painting and say, "Why bother, when real landscapes exist?" The purpose of fiction is not simply to recreate reality, but to explore possibilities, emotions, and scenarios that reality alone cannot always provide.
This is especially relevant when it comes to personal fantasy and creative expression. A fictional scenario does not necessarily represent a literal desire to make something happen in the real world. People have always explored ideas, emotions, and situations through fiction that they would never pursue in reality. The value of fantasy is often
in the experience of imagining, not in replacing the real thing.
In the end, fantasy exists because humans are not only observers of reality, we are creators and explorers of possibilities. We imagine because the world is fascinating,
but also because it is incomplete. The ability to create something that does not exist
is not a rejection of reality, it is one of the things that makes us human.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
It's a comedian, not serious
Odd that the comedian prefaced his skit by saying; “Very passionate people, my MAGA friends…..” I wonder if he’s inferring that the progressive/liberal folks are inherently more intelligent?
He might be inferring that liberals are more intelligent, but he is clearly saying
that MAGA has a aversion to USING their intelligence.
When you stop using a muscle, it gets mushy.
The brain needs training to stay flexible and strong too.
Does he have a point? How many times do you see comments berating 'book smarts'?
only registered users can see external links
(That's not my opinion, that's an opinion of the 'manosphere')
(They even have a point, but they don't ask themselves: "WHY?")
I must say that I tend to agree with the guy that looked like a “blueberry”. I understand that swans are monogamous and quite often are together for THEIR lifetime. The “as long as we both shall live” is not always true for human beings
It's also culture that makes girls appear more picky.
If a guy sleeps with lots of girls, he's considered a stud,
if a girl sleeps with lots of guys, she's considered a slut.
It's the 'manosphere' themselves that strengthens that culture.
It's culturally historically more important for women to pick the right man, than for men to pick the right woman, because the man was the provider of the family. Pick the wrong guy, and she is setting herself up for poverty the rest of her life. It's the 'manosphere' themselves that want women to be financially dependent on men.
It's the 'manosphere' themselves that want women to be obedient and unable to leave
a guy. They also think that beating a woman is legitimate punishment for disobedience. Well, that will result in women being very careful when they pick a guy.
These 'manosphere' also oppose abortion and celebrate restrictions on reproductive freedom. That doesn't very much improve sexual liberation for women. It makes picking
a good man more important too.
So, I don't know what the goals of these 'manosphere' guys are, but it looks like they don't think a lot about the consequences of their own ideology. If they want women to put out more, they should end the stigmas around women enjoying sex, support women to be financially independent, stop dominating women and support reproductive freedom.
A National Toxicology Program report indicates that fluoride levels above 1.5 mg/L are associated with lower IQ in children, exceeding the recommended 0.7 mg/L standard in U.S. water. While the EPA reviews these findings, public health groups continue to support standard community water fluoridation. Read the full update from the EPA at epa.gov.
Could explain the explosion of dumbass liberals?
Are liberals the only people who drink tap water?
By the way, many areas in your country are suffering from tap water that is polluted with Lead, Manganese, Arsenic, Mercury, Nitrate, PFAS and Pesticide residues, which also can/will affect the brains of children.
The Trump EPA has proposed or made changes that reduce environmental monitoring
and transparency, related to toxins in tap water.
Yes, a disproportionate number of America's worst lead-pipe problems are in older, heavily urbanized cities that currently vote Democratic. But that is largely an age/industrialization/geography phenomenon, not evidence that Democratic cities uniquely created the problem.
Cities/water utilities can be responsible for some or all of the relevant infrastructure, but ownership varies by jurisdiction, and the responsibility for ensuring safe drinking water is broader than simply “who owns the pipe?”.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), the bipartisan infrastructure law Biden signed in November 2021, provided:
- $15 billion specifically for lead service-line identification and replacement over 5 years
- Another $11.7 billion in general Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, which could also be used for lead-pipe replacement
- $50 billion total for drinking-water and wastewater infrastructure.
The Senate vote was 69–30. All 50 Democrats voted for it, along with 19 Republicans.
The final House vote was 228–206. 13 Republicans voted for it and 6 Democrats voted against it.
The infrastructure law was bipartisan, but the overwhelming majority of House Republicans opposed it. The LCRI was finalized on October 30, 2024, just before Trump took office. Trump's general deregulation agenda created a threat to the LCRI, but the EPA chose to defend it.
Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, Detroit and Cincinnati all have Democratic political environments, yet they're pursuing substantial replacement programs. Pittsburgh in particular is doing exceptionally well. Pittsburgh Water says it replaced its 14,000th lead service line by December 2025 and is on track to eliminate all residential lead lines in its service area by the end of 2027.
There is also a big difference in cost:
Chicago: ~$31,000/line
Evanston: ~$15,000/line
Elgin: ~$10,950/line
Riverside: ~$9,200/line
The same contractors sometimes work in these communities. One explanation identified was that the suburbs make it easier to replace multiple lines along a block at once and have fewer administrative/permit costs.
The project is much more expensive in Chicago, because it has an extremely complicated underground environment. You're not just digging a hole and replacing a pipe: you're working around water mains, gas lines, electrical infrastructure, sewer lines, telecommunications, streets and sidewalks. And because Chicago is so old and densely built, some of this infrastructure is very difficult to map precisely.
Rural areas in the U.S. still have some lead water pipes, but generally far fewer than older industrial cities. Many rural households historically relied on private wells rather than centralized water systems, so they never had as many lead service lines to begin with. The remaining problem is partly an infrastructure-age issue: lead pipes are concentrated in communities that built extensive water systems during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and some smaller communities also have incomplete records about where lead lines remain.
an urban river.
Even bottled water has fluoride in it. Some bottled waters have more fluoride than fluoridated tap water, because fluoride occurs naturally in the groundwater or spring source. EU law requires the label to include an analytical composition listing its characteristic constituents. Above 1.5 mg/L, natural mineral water must carry a warning that it is unsuitable for infants and young children. Currently, the European benchmark for daily consumption is 3.3 mg of fluoride per day, from all sources. EFSA established this in its 2025 reassessment as a “safe level of intake” for adults and everyone over
8 y.o.. It is deliberately conservative and is intended to cover potential effects on the nervous system, thyroid, and bones.
New Comment Go to top