Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Tired of ads
on this site?

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III

Discussion Forum on Show It Off

Page #2

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#240

Started by CAT52! [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51  other posts
NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.

New Comment       Rating: 2  


Comments:
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Sep,26 07:15 other posts 
US diplomats told to say ‘super intelligence’ — not ‘artificial intelligence’.

only registered users can see external links

The State Department is ordering diplomats in its international organizations bureau to use the term “super intelligence” instead of “artificial intelligence” in all communications following President Donald Trump’s attempt to rebrand the technology in his address to the U.N. General Assembly this week.

AI isn't there yet, and maybe never will. In computer science, "Superintelligence" (or Artificial General Intelligence / AGI) is a technical term reserved for a hypothetical future stage of AI. It describes a system that vastly exceeds the intellectual capabilities of the human brain across all disciplines, including emotional intelligence and social skills. Applying this label to current generative AI tools, which are powerful, but prone to errors
and lack genuine understanding, is viewed by experts as a fundamental ignorance of scientific nomenclature.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 27,Sep,26 10:31 other posts 
To me it means “the serious lack of intelligence”.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Sep,26 12:14 other posts 
It's damn worrying how much it can already do and does without being asked,
but it is even more worrying how damn irresponsible its creators are.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 27,Sep,26 14:31 other posts 
Agree
By phart [Ignore] 28,Sep,26 14:39 other posts  ⤴
No, what is worrying is the fact our school kids aren't being taught the 3 r's so to speak and are being raised as useful idiots and they will have to rely on AI just to survive.
The need for AI would diminish greatly if Organic Intelligence were better cultivated.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 28,Sep,26 18:07 other posts 
I grew up with The Encyclopedia Británica in my home and even when I had my kids it was the same. AI, GOOGLE, or any other form of human knowledge is there to use and how much or how little someone depends on it is a personal choice.
Perhaps you believe that all knowledge should be stored in a persons mind but you know very well that’s impossible
So my question to you is, “If a problem gets solved using AI or the old noodle, what’s wrong with that?”
By phart [Ignore] 28,Sep,26 18:43 other posts 
People are already getting so lazy they can't or won't do much of anything. the less people have to think,the dumber they will get.

It is to the point we will need AI to survive because it will solve the no humans will work but want problem.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 28,Sep,26 23:20 other posts 
I agree with you here.

If the get their education via AI or if they delegate thinking to AI then they'll get dumber and dumber.

But can't you see that that's precisely what trump wants?
By phart [Ignore] 29,Sep,26 00:59 other posts 
How's that? You can't earn more money and pay more taxes if you are DUMB?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 06:07 other posts 
“I love the poorly educated.” — Trump, 2016.
only registered users can see external links

He ordered the federal government to facilitate closing the Department of Education.
only registered users can see external links

His FY2026 budget cut non-defense discretionary spending by 23% and continued the process of shutting down the Education Department.
only registered users can see external links

His administration proposed cutting NIH funding by roughly 40%, about $18 billion, and NSF funding by 57%.
only registered users can see external links

More than 7,800 federally funded research grants were terminated or frozen
under his administration in 2025.
only registered users can see external links

He called the press “the enemy of the people”.
only registered users can see external links

His administration has explicitly targeted scientific research it considers ideologically objectionable, including climate and social-science research.
only registered users can see external links

Yes, we can safely conclude that Trump wants to make Americans dumber.

He can make you pay more taxes, if you are dumb enough to not understand
that tariffs are taxes.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 23:05 other posts 
why is it such a problem giving control of kids education back to the parents that bear them and raise them and the states-counties they live in?
it is sick that people think the feds should do anything other than perhaps set a standard as to how well students read,write and do arithmetic before they are allowed to graduate,but as far as anything else,that should be up to the counties and the parents. Farming towns don't need tech they need agriculture and cities don't need as much ag,but more tech.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 10:41 other posts 
Why are you talking about 'control'? What Trump is cutting is affecting the quality of schools a lot. You think that education already sucks, so why are you OK with more cuts? It requires investments to make education better. Every dollar invested in education creates a 300%-700% return on investment in the future. That's why wealthy people send their kids to expensive private schools.

Elite private schools in the United States that cater to wealthy families lean heavily into rigorous, secular logical reasoning, advanced sciences, biology, economics, and elite academics. They strictly do not teach creationism as science and do not leave out evolution or other religion-challenging topics.
That's because religion is intended to keep the working folks obedient.
The wealthy want their children to USE IT, NOT BELIEVE IT.

As you know, there is more than 1 child in a class, so you cannot have schools listen to the loudest parents who are demanding that the kids are educated the way THEY see it. That's why you need standards, and that is not sick.

You DON'T think that parents should be able to decide everything for THEIR children, because you want the government to meddle in their choices related to trans-gender kids.

Children should have a broad basis, that gives them choices. That should not be limited to where they live and certainly not what the loud-mouth parents of other children make their teachers do. If you don't allow some standards from the government, you have one school teach ONLY creation, the bible, the 10 commandments, and skip everything related to biology, geology, and other science, other schools who only teach gender studies, veganology or whatever the fuck, and only a few moderate schools who actually provide your country with children who are capable of surviving the harsh reality of your extremely individualistic capitalist society. Both extremes are useless to your wealthy, so I would think that you would support some standards for how kids are educated.
Your MAGA culture worships stupidity, and you wonder why kids fail in school.
By DeepThroatThis [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 11:10 other posts 
I'm waiting for him to name the ball room "The Trump House" before he leaves office
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 12:30 other posts 
If that ballroom comes to pass, it surely will have his name on it.
And it will probably be kept there by all presidents after him.
Just not for the reason that Trump imagines.




By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 08:50 other posts 
"Jack Smith Testimony Continued" (parody, but accurate)
only registered users can see external links


By whatsupcocks [Ignore] 05,Oct,26 23:09 other posts 
THIS IS Halloween
--------------------------------------- added after 12 seconds

only registered users can see external links
By CAT52! [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 06:06 other posts 
Wow, what a great show. Thanks for sharing that.


By CAT52! [Ignore] 05,Oct,26 14:12 other posts 
Pitbull AKA Chihuahua, you posted on that used rag thread of yours:

“ PITBULL [Ignore] 7d ago other posts

Admn. Will ignore her. All of her complaints when to the trash.”

Let me, (CAT52!), ask you. Are you missing a BLOG? 🤣🤣😈


By leopoldij [Ignore] 28,Sep,26 23:21 other posts 
I saw phart's name here:

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 29,Sep,26 00:57 other posts 
You won't see my name there.
You have to finish a job once you start it, and this guy is encouraging people to jump ship, give up and hide under a rock I guess.


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Sep,26 03:50 other posts 
This is what a socialist will do for you, when you get scammed by your employer:

Zohran forces Doordash to pay $131 Million
only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 23,Sep,26 08:15 other posts 
wow,what will that do to Door dash? raise their prices? put them out of business? then what has zohran done? Put people out of work, gee, that money does not come from the sky,it comes from peoples pocket books
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Sep,26 10:22 other posts 
I don't fucking care. If they steal from their employees, they should feel the consequences. If that results in them needing to pass on the costs of their fines
to the customer, then the customer picks their competition, like Uber Eats, Grubhub, Seamless, Gopuff, Getir, Gorillas, Buyk, Fridge No More or Jokr, or a few friends who
start a new small company together. Yes, fuck them, put them out of business.

That does NOT put people out of work, because the DEMAND is still there.
All those delivery people can just simply go to a BETTER employer.
They cannot do that, when an unscrupulous employer drives competitors
out of the market by being the cheapest, because he is scamming his employees
out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

I want competition that promotes employers treating their employees fairly,
I don't want competition that rewards employers scamming their employees.

DoorDash STOLE over a hundred million dollars from their employees.
Mamdani is forcing them to pay that back to their employees.

You think that you should have the right to kill someone, if they break into your house
to steal your shit. Why then are you OK with employers stealing from employees?
So, would you agree with employees killing their employers?
They're just protecting their property, like you want from a burglar.

Or is it because they wear a suit and tie. If a burglar wears a nice suit and tie,
is it then OK that he steals your shit?
By phart [Ignore] 23,Sep,26 11:09 other posts 
"At-Will Employment: New York is an at-will employment state. This means an employer can fire a worker at any time for almost any reason, unless a contract or union agreement protects the worker"

so the employees will probably be looking for more work,

If a employee choses to work somewhere, it is up to them to keep track of their salarys and such.
not happy , go elsewhere
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Sep,26 11:53 other posts 
True, which is very much right-wing. If New Yorkers elect more Mamdanis, that policy will surely be changed, and employees will get more job security and predictability.
But that is a separate issue from allowing employers to steal from employees.

It's possible to have no protection from getting fired and still punish employers when they steal from their employees.

I just explained to you that when employers can be the cheapest by scamming their employees, they are than able to crush the competition that doesn't. Those employers might have trouble attracting employees, but employers who are a bit more expensive because they don't steal from employees have trouble attracting clients.
It's up to the government to provide a fair competition playing ground, so it's not a race to the bottom.

Stealing is stealing. If you don't want burglars in your home, there are also alternatives to be allowed to kill them, just like there are alternatives for employees who don't want to be robbed. Why allow that crime for one, and punish it with death for the other?
By phart [Ignore] 26,Sep,26 17:01 other posts 
If you make it difficult to fire employees, and require to much pay and etc, you can it what you want, but if company's don't make a profit, there is no incentive to exist in the first place and jobs will just disappear. then these folks whining about money and jobs, will have NEITHER. You seem to forget the whole purpose of starting a company and operating it.

And don't sit there and think, "well we need this service or that product, companys will have to provide", No, you will just do with out. you are owed nothing
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Sep,26 12:20 other posts 
Companies can make a profit without stealing from employees.
If they cannot do that, they have no justification to exist.
If capitalism can only serve a tiny group of people, than the rest of us
should replace it with a system that serves everyone.


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Sep,26 07:10 other posts 
What is Christian Nationalism? (a short video)
only registered users can see external links


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Sep,26 08:28 other posts 
American Reacts to "Why the US is Losing All of Its Smartest People"
only registered users can see external links


By leopoldij [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 13:58 other posts 
A Husband takes his wife to play her first game of golf. Of course, the wife promptly hacked her first shot right through the window of the biggest house adjacent to the course.

The husband cringed, 'I warned you to be careful! Now we'll have to go up there, find the owner, apologize and see how much your lousy drive is going to cost us.'

So the couple walked up to the house and knocked on the door. A warm voice said,

'Come on in.'
When they opened the door they saw the damage that was done: glass was all over the place, and a broken antique bottle was lying on its side near the pieces of window glass. A man reclining on the couch asked,

'Are you the people that broke my window?'
'Uh...yeah! , sir. We're sure sorry about that,' the husband replied.

'Oh, no apology is necessary. Actually I want to thank you..You see, I'm a genie, and I've been trapped in that bottle for a thousand years. Now that you've released me, I'm allowed to grant three wishes. I'll give you each one wish, but if you don't mind, I'll keep the last one for my self.

'Wow, that's great!' the husband said. He pondered a moment and blurted out,
'I'd like a million dollars a year for the rest of my life.'

'No problem,' said the genie 'You've got it, it's the least I can do. And I'll guarantee you a long, healthy life! And now you, young lady, what do you want?' the genie asked.

'I'd like to own a gorgeous home in every country in the world complete with servants,' she said.

'Consider it done,' the genie said. 'And your homes will always be safe from fire, burglary and natural disasters!'

'And now,' the couple asked in unison, 'what's your wish, genie?'

'Well, since I've been trapped in that bottle, and haven't been with a woman in more than a thousand years, my wish is to have sex with your wife.'

The husband looked at his wife and said,
'Gee, honey, you know we both now have a fortune, and all those houses. What do you think?'

She mulled it over for a few moments and said,
'You know, you're right. Considering our good fortune, I guess I wouldn't mind, but what about you, honey?'

'You know I love you sweetheart,' said the husband. I'd do the same for you!'

So the genie and the woman went upstairs where they spent the rest of the afternoon enjoying each other. The genie was insatiable.
After about three hours of non-stop sex, the genie rolled over and looked directly into her eyes and asked, How old are you and your husband?'

'Why, we're both 35,' she responded breathlessly.

'No Kidding,' he said. 'Thirty-five years old and you both still believe in genies?'
--------------------------------------- added after 112 seconds

For phart
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 14:17 other posts 
He would just take it as evidence that all wealthy people are brilliant.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 15:28 other posts 
Anything is possible, but I thought it might amuse him.
By phart [Ignore] 19,Sep,26 07:45 other posts 
I actually did laugh,
By leopoldij [Ignore] 19,Sep,26 11:18 other posts 
I'm collecting for jokes.
--------------------------------------- added after 13 hours

Delete "for"
--------------------------------------- added after 13 hours

I meant to write "funny"


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 16:26 other posts 
Did Putin just try to kill Boris Johnson?

only registered users can see external links

This could have been the moment the Ukraine war exploded into a direct confrontation between Russia and the West.

A Russian drone struck a train near the Ukrainian-Polish border only minutes after a diplomatic train carrying former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt and other senior European figures had passed. Former CIA Director David Petraeus was still at the station on another train. Ukrainian railway officials say it is highly probable that the diplomatic train was the intended target.

Nobody was killed. But if the timing had been different, a Russian strike could have killed senior European political figures and one of America's most prominent former intelligence chiefs. The resulting crisis between Russia and the West could have been enormous, with the potential for a dangerous escalation.

And perhaps the most disturbing question is this:
Why is almost nobody talking about this?

The drone missed its potential target by minutes. The consequences of a hit could have been almost unimaginable.

How close do we have to get to a catastrophe before the world starts paying attention?
By phart [Ignore] 16,Sep,26 12:14 other posts 
Well, Putin knows the US has strained it's military inventory trying to supply Ukraine and also trying to deal with Iran, so he is probably thinking it is prime time to go ahead and start pecking away at his next targets.
All these years of taxing your citizens and giving them "free" health care and so forth ,equal to chopping a leg off for a broken toenail quality of care, you should have been building up a military instead of counting on the US to be there for you.to much faith in a treaty on paper and not enough common sense. the folks that wrote all that shit after 1945 are DEAD
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 18,Sep,26 18:16 other posts 
You claim Putin thinks this is prime time to attack next targets, but that completely ignores the reality on the ground. Russia has burned through an astronomical amount of its own military resources, equipment, and manpower in Ukraine; they are in no position to spark a wider conflict.

The only reason Russia is trapped in this position is because Ukraine was given the weapons to fight back and strike hard. Nothing weakens Russian expansionism more effectively than continuing to support Ukraine to inflict maximum damage. It is a grim reality, but the meat-grinder consuming Russian forces is actively dismantling their
long-term military capabilities.

Unfortunately, the Russian public is kept in the dark by state propaganda. The only way
to truly stop Putin is to ensure the devastating costs of his war become impossible to hide at home; only when the Russian people clearly see the consequences, will internal pressure finally build against his regime.

You have a major misconception about how our system actually works. We never had 'free' healthcare. For decades, we had a highly efficient public national health insurance system (Ziekenfonds), which everyone paid into through a small, affordable monthly premium. It was simple, collective, and cost-effective.

The financial strain only started when right-wing politicians forced the privatization of our healthcare system in 2006. Once private insurance companies took over, premiums skyrocketed, corporate overhead increased, and an expensive bureaucratized market was created. A public system is simply much cheaper for ordinary citizens than a market-driven one.

Furthermore, the claim that our public spending on healthcare is what ruined our military budget is factually incorrect. Ironically, the exact same right-wing political parties that pushed to privatize our healthcare were also the ones who aggressively cut and hollowed out our defense spending for decades. Our lack of military buildup wasn't caused by funding public social care; it was the direct result of right-wing austerity and budget-cutting.

I don't blindly oppose everything Trump does; I look at the objective geopolitical outcomes. For instance, putting pressure on Iran and standing up to China's economic overreach are necessary actions, especially since both regimes are actively funding and supplying Russia's war effort. My criticism isn't about the need to counter Iran or China;
it is about his chaotic and unstable methods.

Instead of building a united front, his approach is inverted; he is hostile toward historic friends, while being remarkably friendly toward greatest enemies. Our adversaries are playing this game much smarter; while Trump is busy alienating long-standing democratic allies over transactional deals, Russia, China, and Iran are actively consolidating their own alliance to exploit these fractures in the West.

We should be working together and building collective strength, rather than tearing each other apart. Unfortunately, Trump has convinced a large part of the American public that your allies are just 'freeloaders' exploiting the US. That narrative is a destructive lie; it reduces vital international solidarity and shared security to a transactional market deal. When you trick people into viewing cooperation as a liability, you play right into the hands of regimes like Russia and China. True strength doesn't come from turning your back on your partners; it comes from building global stability together.


By leopoldij [Ignore] 10,Sep,26 05:38 other posts 
Please vote for trump!!!

He promised that every adult American would get $5000 if he wins.

This is illegal for everyone except trump because trump is above the law! Good for him!

There are 269,800,000 adult Americans.
Let us now do an advanced calculation:

369,800,000 × 5000 = $1,349,000,000,000.

That's a big number. I can't read it because it has too many zeros. So let me ask grok.
It replies:

1.349 trillion dollars

Ok, great.
That's not a big expense for trump.

For those (radical left losers) who doubt that he'll find the money, let me reply truly and sternly:

President Trump will fire the fed head and he'll print 2 trillion dollars within a day after he wins. He'll give 1.3 trillion to the people and he'll invest the rest.

So, there.
Go vote for trump.
You'll get $5000.

Guaranteed.

Legal.

Feasible.

Done deal.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 10,Sep,26 08:11 other posts 
🤣🤣🤣
By phart [Ignore] 10,Sep,26 09:50 other posts 
Go ahead , laugh, where you be if camala had got it?
By leopoldij [Ignore] 10,Sep,26 15:48 other posts  ⤴
This phart maggaggahaha is not naive. He'll get 5000 dollars.
By phart [Ignore] 10,Sep,26 23:06 other posts 
I am smart enough not to believe that shit.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 10,Sep,26 23:21 other posts 
Okay Phart, why did he say it? You know that's attempted btibart
By leopoldij [Ignore] 11,Sep,26 14:07 other posts 
He's "smart" enough not to believe that his supreme leader will give him 5000 dollars but he's not smart enough to believe his other nonsense.

How can one be selectively smart?
lol
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Sep,26 15:41 other posts 
Some people have brains where the left side doesn't communicate with the right side
By leopoldij [Ignore] 11,Sep,26 18:37 other posts 
I'll try to repeat the calculation and send it to him.
Maybe he'll realise,
now that he's smart
that trump is lying.

Let's see.
I'm repeating.
By phart [Ignore] 11,Sep,26 23:22 other posts  ⤴
No Neuron, I don't believe it because to many people would stand in the way of doing it.
Remember he wanted to send 2000 dollars for stimulus after the wuhan virus thing and only was able to send 600.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 12,Sep,26 07:11 other posts 
There are 269,800,000 adult Americans.
Let us now do an advanced calculation:

369,800,000 × 5000 = $1,349,000,000,000.
By phart [Ignore] 12,Sep,26 09:54 other posts 
I can tell you are a liberal by the way you pad numbers, first sentence you state there are 269,800,000 Americans, then your math uses 369,800,000. you just can't make this stuff up, liberals stumble over their own 2 feet trying to make a case.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Sep,26 15:31 other posts 
Covid stimulus was needed, because people lost their jobs.
It was a loan on the future, because people were hurting bad.
It created inflation, but that was worth it, at that time.

Why do you need it now? Everything is going fantastic, right?
Increasing the debt, and creating inflation, just for giggles?

Anyway, he is never going to do it, and will make up some stupid excuse.
And you will believe it, like you always do.

In the very unlikely event that he is going to do it, then he'll just cut healthcare spending even more, or increase the tariffs for everything, so the consumer pays for it. If not, your country pays more interest on that debt, until the next Democratic president is forced to clean up the shit that Trump left.
By phart [Ignore] 14,Sep,26 15:34 other posts 
I just said I don't figure it will happen, to many people in the way of it if it could happen.

But if it did,great,I would just pay off debt with it and be in better shape.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Sep,26 15:42 other posts 
For you personally, I understand that you could use it.
But you would accuse any Democrat who said this of incredible
fiscal irresponsibility.

How about a socialist who decides that you are owed disability benefits?
That's not all the other millions of people who don't need it, but just you
and people like you. Or are you too scared that some brown people get it too?
By phart [Ignore] 14,Sep,26 22:47 other posts 
You weren't told by your lawyer that you were the wrong color like I was. so none of it would make sense to you, easy to understand how you think the way you do on that.

Disability in this country is a promise to the working man that is not kept.Fraud has made it difficult for the honest man to get it.
But some dumbass like my neighbors son,that od on drugs and essentially blow their own minds, can get it without working a damn lick.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 06:52 other posts 
If that were true, you could have sued them for discrimination.
The answer is NOT less disability benefits, but MORE.
The fraud argument is abused to not provide ANY. It's a lie.
They keep pointing to people who don't deserve it, to not give any to YOU, who DOES. You were tricked into supporting your own abuse.

Suppose a hospital has a problem with people faking symptoms
to get treatment they don't need. Would you conclude that the hospital
should stop treating sick people?

Obviously not. You'd say: distinguish the sick patients from the people abusing the system. However, they are telling you that ALL those people
are faking it, just so they can close the hospital and save a lot of money.

I am saying; it's a lie, there are surely people faking it, but that doesn't justify closing the hospital. Fix the damn problem! It's not that difficult.
And I rather have a few fakers, than turning away actual patients.

Trump controls the House, the Senate and the Supreme Court.
When is he actually going to FIX some problems, to help YOU?
Did Elon Musk not eliminate all the waste, fraud and abuse?
How long can they lie to you, before you start noticing?
By phart [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 10:21 other posts 
I am sure i can come up with similar info on disability claims. only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 11:36 other posts 
The headline makes it sound like the government has discovered
$6.5 billion that was stolen. That is not what the document establishes.
At the time of the announcement, 455 people had been charged, not convicted. So even the characterization of every dollar as “fraud”
is legally speaking, an allegation at that point.

$6.5 billion is about 0.12% of total U.S. health-care spending for one year,
if the number was true. Find me any system that has a lower fraud rate.
Look into Trump's businesses, that have fraud as THE business model.

By the way, not all of those 455 people are people consuming care.
90 are doctors or other licensed medical professionals. The other ~365 defendants include business owners, executives, marketers, pharmacists, operators of health-care companies, and other alleged participants.

The Department of Defense has failed its annual department-wide financial audit every year since these audits began in 2018. The 2024 audit was its seventh consecutive failure. 50.3% of the Pentagon's assets are unaccounted for. Do you think that only 0.12% of that is fraud?
Do you now want to eliminate your Pentagon?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 15,Sep,26 10:50 other posts  ⤴
Unfortunately, cleaning up the Clown’s shit is going to take a big effort and time, both legally and figuratively
By leopoldij [Ignore] 11,Sep,26 18:37 other posts  ⤴
Please vote for trump!!!

He promised that every adult American would get $5000 if he wins.

This is illegal for everyone except trump because trump is above the law! Good for him!

There are 269,800,000 adult Americans.
Let us now do an advanced calculation:

369,800,000 × 5000 = $1,349,000,000,000.

That's a big number. I can't read it because it has too many zeros. So let me ask grok.
It replies:

1.349 trillion dollars

Ok, great.
That's not a big expense for trump.

For those (radical left losers) who doubt that he'll find the money, let me reply truly and sternly:

President Trump will fire the fed head and he'll print 2 trillion dollars within a day after he wins. He'll give 1.3 trillion to the people and he'll invest the rest.

So, there.
Go vote for trump.
You'll get $5000.

Guaranteed.

Legal.

Feasible.

Done deal.


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#240



Show It Off